Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Art’

Nabeel on what makes art great: 1) Great art is not predictable or obvious, it is surprising. 2) Great art contains multiple overlapping layers of echoes. 3) Great art contains more meaning than can be paraphrased.

Here’s a Jackson Dahl podcast with Tyler and Nabeel.

Excerpts:

In good human works, every detail feels carefully chosen.

Great artworks are hard to compress (i.e. have high information content); slop is easy to compress. 

We barely see everyday objects because we are so used to them (low novel information again), but great art can make you see these objects afresh, the way a child might. 

This strangeness is essential for the effect of great art, because we like to make sense of things, and if we make sense of things too easily they are not interesting to us; great works of art are therefore necessarily somewhat difficult to grasp the meaning of, their meanings are multiple and constantly shifting, and they require a pleasant kind of effort to make sense of.

Great literary works are full of these hidden patterns, which silently create a kind of electric charge of coherence across the text as you are reading, and which contribute to the feeling that we are reading something intentionally knit together as an aesthetic whole.

…not only do you have to surprise readers in interesting and precise ways, but you also have to make sure that multiple patterns cohere across the entire work and are not simply local and uncorrelated.

There’s a feeling of limitless depth that is unique to the really great works: it feels like you can always find more patterns, more coherence, more beauty on rereading. Or that more readings will give you a deeper understanding, but never a perfect or complete one.

Another facet of depth is mystery. Good art is always a bit under-explained. It allows you to speculate. Characters may have multiple motives. 

Read Full Post »

I received a free acrylic painting session after dining at an art-themed restaurant. The restaurant has an art room that provides canvases, paints, and brushes, but unfortunately, it does not offer instruction.

This was my first time trying acrylic painting. I did some quick research to get a sense of how best to proceed. Partly due to time constraints, and partly my lack of patience, the result was not as good as I had envisioned. But it was a good experience. It captures my first attempt at acrylic painting and the many hours I have spent with my boy on the basketball court.

Read Full Post »

From The Economist’s obituary on David Hockney:

Having decided on the composition, he used props and photographs, played with perspectives, and paced out measurements in the studio: all the techniques he’d learned at art school and since. Mostly, though, he was working from the heart. Painting was how he made sense of the world…

Painting 18 hours a day, seven days a week, he finished it at last the night before the shippers came to take it to America. He felt like his hero Picasso, who liked to say: “I’m not painting; I’m exploring.”…

He stopped worrying about being contemporary and set about creating his own kind of art, art of his own time…

Finding new ways of making art filled his life with a sense of renewal…

Soon he would swap paints for pixels, becoming just as adept at painting portraits and landscapes first on his phone, then on an iPad. In 2012 he covered four walls of the Royal Academy with iPad paintings of one particular bend of one lane in east Yorkshire, on every day of the year and in every sort of light. Just before covid-19 struck in 2019 he moved to Normandy, and posted digital pictures of the emerging spring. These were later turned into a massive galleria, a cathedral of green, enough to fill L’Orangerie in Paris. If his poolside painting of the man in the peachy-pink jacket was a snapshot of a moment when he was 35, he described his final work as his Bayeux Tapestry, a long walk through a whole life.

From BBC’s obituary:

He had simply followed one rule: “Paint the things you love”…

He was single-minded and devoted to drawing. The wartime shortage of paper restricted his early efforts to the kitchen floor and hymn books in church…

Hockney’s appearance may have been flamboyant but his work ethic was Protestant. For 12 hours a day, he worked furiously at his easel…

His work-rate remained prodigious. He placed a sign at the foot of his bed in Notting Hill, telling himself to “GET UP AND START WORK IMMEDIATELY”.

If he grew tired of drawing, Hockney would take photographs, do etchings or design operas. He was haunted by the feeling he wasn’t doing enough…

Few artists have been more excited by technology than Hockney…

Hockney’s new passion was landscapes: the traditional pastime of the weekend amateur.

He moved to Bridlington, where his sister and elderly mother now lived, and began to paint the Yorkshire Wolds.

Each summer, the teenage Hockney had cycled here from Bradford to earn pocket money on local farms. 

The countryside was beautiful and brought back memories of working on the harvest and sleeping in barns with his friends.

For Hockney, this was just as much a paradise as California in the 1960s.

He stood outdoors in all weathers, he painted hundreds of scenes of lush meadows and roadside verges. They were often on a monumental scale.

It was an old man’s challenge to an art scene focused on the young, the cynical and the conceptual.

And Shelia Hicks on her work from Maria Popova:

I don’t even think about art. People want to pull me into the art thing all the time… Is this art or isn’t this art… What is art? I think people do what they feel like doing, and not authenticating things. These podcasts and these interviews and this reportage and these exhibitions, a lot of it has to do with trying to authenticate things, validate things. Here in Paris, we have a hundred exhibitions opening every week. What are we validating? And if you’re not validated and if you’re not being exhibited, what are you doing? Are you wasting your time or are you just simply doing what you feel like doing and that you like doing?

When I made this, I didn’t make it with any intention that it’s supposed to be craft or art or design or decoration. Or what is it? It just is. Take it or leave it.

Read Full Post »

I liked Mason Currey’s Daily Rituals, so I picked up this book about how various artists fund their creative lives. Like his previous book, it offers interesting glimpses into different artists’ lives and their attitudes toward money.

There is no single correct way to fund a creative life. Some people succeed by pursuing creative work on the side. Others need to devote themselves fully before they can make progress. And some people, without external constraints, end up wasting their time. Each of us has to find an arrangement that fits our personality and that we can live with.

Frugality helps as it provides more options. But for certain pursuits, such as professional sports and chess, age and timing also matter. I admire artists who give everything to creating art or mastering their craft. But a chaotic and uncertain life does not suit my temperament. So I chose to focus on building financial security first, before shifting more of my time toward hobbies in my late 30s and early 40s.

Overall, I think that choice has worked out well. The encouraging thing is that it is not too late to begin and improve at many artistic activities. And while I cannot compete in sports at a professional level, there are still enough opportunities to play with others. I can also enjoy simply practising on my own.

Excerpts:

This reader is someone powerfully drawn to a life in the arts and at the same time powerfully stumped by the difficulty of balancing those ambitions with the very real need to pay rent and put food in the fridge. Sure, there are some well-worn paths forward: Get a day job and do your creative work in your spare time. Go to graduate school and try to find a foothold in academia that encourages or at least tolerates your art-making practice. Pursue a sort-of-related career–journalism for writers, say, or graphic design for visual artists–and hope to channel your artistic impulses into this more financially secure profession. Find somewhere extremely affordable to live and get by on a little income as possible. Become a genius at applying for–and winning–grants, fellowships, residencies, retreats, contests, and other funding opportunities. Coax money out of your parents, acquire a patron, or attract a life partner who’s willing to subsidise your art. Or–most elusive of all–make your art pay, by tailoring it to the market place or somehow forcing the culture to come to you.

The dumb truth is that there is no cultural production without financial supports. It is simply not possible to become an accomplished painter or musician or novelist or pet without spending a lot of time experimenting, making false starts, starting over, starting over again, absorbing criticism, thinking, reading, talking, and mooning about the house aimlessly. All this time has to be purchased, one way or another.

Leonard [Virginia Woolf’s husband] writes: “Neither of us ever took a day’s holiday unless we were too ill to work or unless we went away on a regular and, as it were, authorised holiday. We should have felt it was not merely wrong but unpleasant not to work every morning for seven days a week and for about eleven months a year. Every morning, therefore, at about 9.30 after breakfast each of us, as if moved by a law of unquestioned nature, went off and “worked” until lunch at 1. It is surprising how much one can produce in a year, whether of buns or books or pots or pictures, if one works hard and professionally for three and a half hours every day for 330 days.

According to a personal secretary employed by the Ives family for a time, “Mr. Ives would come home from a strenuous day in the insurance business, have his meal, and then go [to] the piano and forget all about time until the wee small hours. He would be completely absorbed in his music.”

In truth, it’s not so easy to make one version of your art just for money and then pivot to the other version, the one you make without worrying about money and maybe even in defiance of it. Trying to do both things at once may prevent you from doing either of them well. And if you succeed at one, the world may not let you pivot to the other.

Read Full Post »

I can’t resist an anime about art. The characters are well designed and well developed, but what I like most is the beautiful, painting-like background. The setting reminds me of my time studying in the UK: the River Thames, an academy that resembles Cambridge, the National Gallery, the British Museum, Westminster Abbey, Covent Garden, the pubs, and side trips to the Cotswolds and the countryside.

Following our hearts or simply doing what we love may sound ideal, but life is often messier, with no clear optimal path. We cannot fully ignore others’ opinions or societal norms either. Since we only get to live one timeline, there will always be “what if” questions, and we will never know how the paths not taken might have unfolded. But at the very least, we should try to find a path, or create a bubble, where we do not betray ourselves and still have room to grow and thrive.

Quotes from the anime:

“As always, the more I paint, the more I’m confounded by the things I lack. It’s the same things over and over. But then, I guess that’s not so bad. After all, as long as I’m painting, I’m always having fun.”

—Lili Ichijoin

“Actually I’ve never once thought my paintings were any good. That’s why I’m so desperate to paint all the time.”

—Kit Church

“I’ve never cared what other people think. What does it have to do with painting?

All I want is to remember the beautiful things I see every day. If I paint them, I won’t forget. That’s the only reason I paint. Honestly, the rankings mean nothing to me.”

—Kit Church

“That’s why his artwork always grabs hold of people and stirs their souls. And then, as if adding insult to injury, it questions you. Are you being honest with yourself? Are you living life to the fullest?”

—Shin Kobayakawa

“When I was a child, I saw the real thing. At that moment…it felt like time had stopped. Even now, I’ve never felt anything more serene. All I could hear was my own heartbeat. For the first time, a cold marble structure taught what it means to be alive. And then it occurred to me. The contours of memory blur with time and become unrecognizable. But even so, if we can capture a moment in time and give it form, perhaps that memory will never fade.”

—Kit Church on Michaelangelo’s The Pieta

Trailer:

Read Full Post »

Mario Gabriele thinks that as AI improves, we might enter a period of endless, individualized media, with much less shared culture in the future. The trend is probably right.

But humans will continue to value shared experience, which suggests shared experience would become more niche and on a smaller scale, like watching live sports, concerts, or playing multiplayer games. Having shared experience and media consumption often facilitate bonding, and sharing what we like with our loved ones brings us joy.

Mario also noted that as AI generated art becomes better than human’s and requires much less effort, artists would need to adapt. For those who have dedicated a lifetime mastering a craft, this development might feel unfair and unwelcome.

For me, I value the process of being a creator. As long as I feel like I’m improving, it doesn’t matter if some AI or human using AI can easily produce better art than I do. It would probably be nice to learn to employ the technology to make better art. That said, I don’t rely on art for making a living, so the development doesn’t affect me as much.

Everything in life is optional in a way, and art fits in this category for me. The main reason to create art, even though it’s unlikely to bring me financial reward or change the world in any meaningful way, is that I value the activity and the accompanying result for their own sakes.

Read Full Post »

Tommy Emmanuel: My Life As a One-Man Band

 

Portuguese artist sketches Hong Kong

 

Alain de Botton on Art as Therapy

Read Full Post »

Art of Balance

Emerson once said that “We are always getting to live, but never living.” We know it’s important to enjoy the present since life’s short, and we never know what’ll happen tomorrow. After all, it’s only possible to live happily ever after on a moment-to-moment basis.  If ‘now’ is what matters, do we need goals, plans, or a New Year resolution? I think there’s a role for them. They help us think about what things we want, why we want them, and how we can achieve them. They act as a guide and help us plan what to do in the present. What we do today will have an impact on our life in the future. And as long as we’re alive, tomorrow will arrive, and future will become present.

Life is about striving a balance: balance between now and future, planning and living, between time spent on my ambitions and time for other people, between working hard toward my goals and enjoying the moments, and between taking my dreams seriously and learning to laugh at myself. It’s also a balance between self-control and spontaneity, honesty and compassion, generosity and thriftiness, caution and boldness, and feeling and reason.

Some of them may not be compatible at the same time, but I believe they’re not incompatible.  Balancing them and deciding when to focus on which in order to make life most enjoyable for both the present and the future is an art I’m learning about.

Read Full Post »